Managing Knowledge and Learning at Nasa and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Essay - 537 Words



  • Since 2008
  • Free revisions
  • Money-back guaranty
  • Up to 5% for the first order. Up to 15% for the orders starting from 2nd

from $9.97/pp

visit site

  • Since 2009
  • Free title page, revisions
  • Discount policy
  • Satisfaction guarantee
  • More than 100 000 orders delivered

from $9.97/pp

visit site

  • Since 2010
  • PhD holding authors only
  • SMS notifications & VIP support
  • Discount policy

from $22/pp

visit site

  • Since 2010
  • 24/7 support team
  • More than 500 writers
  • Money-back guaranty
  • Up to 15% discounts

from $9.97/pp

visit site


StudyMode - Premium and Free Essays, Term Papers & Book Notes





  1. Home >
  2. Essays >
  3. Managing Knowledge and...

Managing Knowledge and Learning at Nasa and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Only available on StudyMode Open Document Save to my library

Please sign up to read full document.

Text Preview Case # 9-603-062 Managing Knowledge and Learning at NASA and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory This case focuses on knowledge management (KM) at NASA after a mandate to move from “expensive, infrequent, heavily engineered” projects to “Faster, Better, Cheaper” projects has been in place for almost ten years. Read the case, discuss it with your team members, and then answer the following questions.


Jeanne Holm, Chief Knowledge Architect for NASA faces challenges in loss of knowledge within the institution through two key areas: 1. A large number of experienced personnel was nearing retirement age. 2. After Goldin’s implementation of “cheaper faster better” mandate, many projects were stretched too thin in time and budget to properly pass down the knowledge acquired during the projects to future projects. Holm must decide what is the best way to pass down the tacit knowledge of the older scientist to the lesser experienced junior scientists and overcome the culture of apathy towards knowledge loss in order for NASA and JPL as a whole to continue space exploration in a time of smaller budgets and resources.

1) What were the pros and cons of the “Faster, Better, Cheaper” model? How might outcomes (both positive and negative) of projects executed with this model impact NASA’s stakeholders, i.e. Congress and the general public?

After Goldin’s implementation of the “faster, better, cheaper” mandate, NASA achieved short term success in its Mars Pathfinder mission. However, this short term success was quickly overtaken by many failed projects which upon later inspection, could have been successful if more care and time had been taken with the projects. The pros with Goldin’s mandate were that programs could be broken down into smaller pieces so a smaller project can be completed faster than a large project. Thus a failure of a smaller project did not affect the overall program as a whole. With a quicker... Show More

Please sign up to read full document.



Which Was a Bigger Failure for the League of Nations - Manchuria or Abysinnia? Did Hoover Deserve the Label of ‘the Do Nothing President’? Forensic science Essay Marketing Essay Taliban Essay Norway Essay Clinical trial Essay Information Architecture: the Design and Integration of Information Spaces

Share this Document

Cancel Send

Join millions of other students and start your research

Become a StudyMode Member


Have a great research document you think will help inspire other StudyMode members?

Share your document

Upload Now

Get full access to more research and tools for only $0.33/day

Upgrade your Membership

GET PREMIUM @2017 Legal Site Map Advertise, Online Education, Hollywood, CA

More great study tools:

{"hostname":"","essaysImgCdnUrl":"\/\/\/pi\/","useDefaultThumbs":true,"defaultThumbImgs":["\/\/\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_1.png","\/\/\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_2.png","\/\/\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_3.png","\/\/\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_4.png","\/\/\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_5.png"],"thumb_default_size":"160x220","thumb_ac_size":"80x110","isPayOrJoin":false,"essayUpload":false,"site_id":1,"autoComplete":false,"isPremiumCountry":false,"userCountryCode":"US","logPixelPath":"\/\/\/pixel.gif","tracking_url":"\/\/\/pixel.gif","cookies":{"unlimitedBanner":"off"},"essay":{"essayId":34412275,"categoryName":"Space Flight","categoryParentId":"29","currentPage":1,"format":"text","pageMeta":{"text":{"startPage":1,"endPage":2,"pageRange":"1-2","totalPages":2}},"access":"premium","title":"Managing Knowledge and Learning at Nasa and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory","additionalIds":[3,52,17,5],"additional":["Business \u0026 Economy","Business \u0026 Economy\/Organizations","Literature","Computer Science"],"loadedPages":{"html":[],"text":[1,2]}},"user":null,"canonicalUrl":"http:\/\/\/essays\/Managing-Knowledge-And-Learning-At-Nasa-552118.html","pagesPerLoad":50,"userType":"member_guest","ct":10,"ndocs":"1,500,000","pdocs":"6,000","cc":"10_PERCENT_1MO_AND_6MO","signUpUrl":"https:\/\/\/signup\/","joinUrl":"https:\/\/\/join","payPlanUrl":"\/checkout\/pay","upgradeUrl":"\/checkout\/upgrade","freeTrialUrl":"https:\/\/\/signup\/?\u0026bypassPaymentPage=1","showModal":"get-access","showModalUrl":"https:\/\/\/signup\/?","joinFreeUrl":"\/essays\/?newuser=1","siteId":1,"facebook":{"clientId":"306058689489023","version":"v2.9","language":"en_US"}} tracking img